Freedictionary.com defines bunker mentality as:
An attitude of extreme defensiveness and self-justification based on an often exaggerated sense of being under persistent attack from others.
In the past, we have seen communities grow at astronomical rates and the power of the political left grow at breakneck speed. When you analyze this growth, you will see the growth was the process of voting in political right wing leaders. In other words, the community feels it will benefit them if they vote in a right wing candidate and market this willingness to help. The community now feels it has some preordained right to justify why they are here. This will end up bringing them more danger because that same right wing leader will now set up a political machine at the highest levels. It will invite a lot of criticism about how and why the left wishes to vote a right wing activist into office.
When a community is cursed with the political left, they must understand it is impossible to get rid of them and not even science, word, or kindness is capable of dealing with this curse of the political left. As much as they plead and state their case to the highest authorities, the simple fact is the obtainment of federal funds and future inclusion with the military machinery guaranteeing the political birth of the left. Now you have just created something called a bunker mentality.
We are very aware of migration and immigration patterns. Migration and immigration throughout the world has been the result of this problem with the political left. Similarly, jobs follow this migration pattern. For a community with a large leftist political base to reverse that migration pattern is very dangerous. This migration pattern is to flee the left, it is not meant to join them, seek their help, or empower them with a bunker mentality. This does not fool the strategist who must face this problem. They are too powerful and usually will use the resources of the state to augment the level of clandestineness. Once they reach power, legitimately or not, the bunker mentality is created. Anyone or everyone is put under 24/7 surveillance, told they are paranoid, and told it is because they have a bunker mentality and need to surrender. To achieve this, there are disturbances and pestering which range from never ending and nonstop to irregular hatred. This would not happen if the political left is able to respect the differences of others, but it does and very frequently. That is considered a normal business day and it has been taken to the extreme levels.
As mean and as degrading as it may seem, the political left are a breed of human characters who will eat a banana, throw the peel out the window and not give any thought to what they did. If you approach them and ask them politely to pick up their trash, they become very defensive and very belligerent. You will be lucky if you wish to escape an argument about how it was not wrong or if there are laws to protect their behavior. Try dealing with this mentality for an entire lifetime. This is why we say the political left is born into this world unjust and unwilling to justify its own birth into the world. Unwilling or not, we try to educate people on the left and give people an understanding of the reality. Maybe they will be able to control and master their fate, and then maybe they will not. We also know the Mongolian style opposition we have gotten is just an ill fated attempt to prevent this education and also prevent many other things. They know how much trouble they will be in if people are educated and they know it will signify their death; they are well aware how much trouble they are in. The political left may not be justified or just at birth but they are born into the world to win and at any cost. Fiscal irresponsibility is that any cost. This is how dangerous they are to an individual and a community, by thinking about safety and wanting to help, they make matters worse.
It is not their behavior which makes you want to get rid of them, it is the fact they come back again and again once you get rid of them. It is the fact when you know someone is sneaking around in the dark, so you turn on all the lights and the whacked out person still thinks it is dark and sneaking around. It is that can do and want to help mentality which is so difficult to get rid of once they are locked onto you. They just will not put it into writing or make this cat and mouse game any easier. It is the fact that every single mistake must be pointed out and even after they are, they pester and will not go away. Pointing out mistakes is futile and we do not even bother anymore, we simply hand it over to prosecutors. They will not self prosecute them and they do not give up while telling you they care and wish to help. Then we ask the prosecutors to give them the full force of the law because they deserve every single ounce of pain and grief this world has in store.
It is also the same people who are reading the book while it is being written. They say they wish to help but it is always on their terms or on terms which upsets you. Once you get rid of them, they come right back and start where they left off. We know the effort is to try and get fed intelligence, then give it to both the left and the right to decipher. The problem is how we do not consider them a friend, know who they are, or wish them in our lives. That is the game they are playing now with snooping and trying to figure out how best to trick or deceive us further. By playing to both sides, they are trying to avoid immunity and prosecution, it is the safest way to steal politically. You would also think after hearing the word no several hundred times, the average person kinder gets it right.
We have visited this problem thousands of times already and the question of what to do or what do we have to do to get rid of Mr. Clandestine. In a decade, we have visited this question thousands of times and Mr. Clandestine hears “no” after thousands of times and is right back at it. Does Mr. Clandestine really think we believe them when they say they are unbiased and want to help? They put themselves through extreme humiliation or extreme danger then turn around and complain about it. We simply do not understand why they skirt every law, endanger everyone, then turn around and complain about it like they are law abiding citizens. They are viewed at this time as fugitives and hostage takers but their actions are even more grossly in error. The only thing we have asked is for them to turn themselves in and speak to the real prosecutors who are waiting patiently. It will be proven just how patiently we have been waiting. We have never asked for their help or written any document to this nature. We cannot take their clandestine efforts, they must speak to the real prosecutors and make this effort. These games with the real prosecutors are going to get them in more and more trouble. There are lawyers involved and grievances. Then they place the pressure on us to explain every single mistake or force them to correct them. It gets nowhere and aggravates the situation more which makes others feel they are as criminality as anyone can get. Why they complain to us and not real prosecutors is not understood. We do not have the authority to prosecute legal grievances; if they have a problem with legal matters, they must contact the real prosecutors, not skirt their authority or the law while revolting or complaining. We are in the tenth year of this and we get zero cooperation while the help we get is never the help we want; they are not the hostage and have no right to complain. We are in the tenth year of this and they are still on attack and complain mode. They are also not the hostage rescuers because we are the hostage rescuers. We always get stuck with something or someone which always turns into an onslaught of attacks. This is going to be a major stumbling area when proliferation is the topic.
Winning is a part of bunker mentality. On the battlefield and real combat, you have bunker mentality. In cyber and satellite warfare you have bunker mentality because it can come at anytime, anyplace and anywhere without a moment of notice or warning. That is bunker mentality and it is also a state of mind described by Thomas Hobbes as a “state of warre.” A bunker mentality is the state of authority. A bunker mentality is the reality because the world is a crazy place with even more crazy people who do not have the acumen to control their own fate. They become stressed this is the process of a bunker mentality. Stress produces frustrations and this frustration leads them to act in illegal or criminal ways which is very difficult to prosecute. To save their skin, they ignore the situation or ignore the need to self prosecute themselves. To save their skin they use authority and power like a novelty or a toy. When power and authority is used like a toy, others get hurt and both thoughts and actions become a weapon of mass destruction. Whenever the topic is a weapon of mass destruction, the strategies overlap the strategy of nuclear arsenals. Terrorists do not back down when they acquire weapons of mass destruction, instead they use it in a fashion to wreak havoc and terror. Maybe by ignoring the issues, they are able to achieve this and make it a reality.
A bunker mentality is merely the process of authority and winning. When the former communist states are analyzed, what is clear to the eye is the infrastructure. However, the reality and political ideology has not changed under a market system. This is why education is so relevant while the process to snuff out this education is so powerful. If you do not educate the problem, the infrastructure will never go away. This is the problem with the left, the ideas never go away. They pester whoever is in power in order to create reforms. In the former communist states, the world is beginning to see market reformed thinkers who are voted into office and it is a doorway for more market minded thinkers. Part of this market thinking mind is the process of education on the market system itself and the need for national security. Without national security, the populous will simply vote into power the leaders who they think will benefit them the most and cure their bunker mentality. Another example of the stress of this bunker mentality would be, “Abandon ship and save you-self!” Stress ignores the solutions while it invokes the devotion of panic to the situation. If you have a leader who is stressed or too ignorant to see reality, then they will use their authority and power to make sure nobody wins and everyone is hurt. They will go down with the ship and taken anyone who is devoted with them. The best people are on the job and they are trying to prosecute the problem when they can get or seek the cooperation needed. This is very difficult when a bunker mentality is constantly thinking about having funds cut off.
Human beings are not aware they must answer the basic issue of why they are present, in power or have authority. To get that answer they have to recognize whether or not they were born just or are they only born to justify the problem. Genetics does have a big predestination along with many environmental factors which bring this out. Life is too complex and human life has too many complexities to simply say behavior is determined by genetics alone. We do know that when it comes to weapons of mass destruction or dangers of an immaculate deception, some people need to be dominated while others need freedom. Those who need to be dominated need to be ruled and those who need freedom need the choices which freedom presents. It is this process of needing to be dominated and ruled which causes various aspects of the bunker mentality. Doing the right thing becomes increasingly more difficult as history expires but it does not mean doing the right thing is not possible because the market allows the freedom needed to manage this human condition.
We do not need more clandestine communication or clandestine attempts to hold us hostage by the left, we have asked them to put their effort in writing where it can be checked for accuracy and theatrics. We have asked them to make known in writing any communications and levels of clandestine efforts because this is a test of criminality. It is not a test of revolt or protest. Criminality is discussed in the chapter called “Clandestine 101.” To ask the cyber and satellite warfare program to go public or explain in detail every single detail of the program can be fulfilled if the political left is asking for this to get to the bottom of the situation. If they ask us to stop or cease any clandestine or transparent effort, then we are fully committed to cooperate. We simply ask for a fair public witness because the wrong actors will not leave. They may have learned why or how they are under a misconception but they have not learned what the solution is. They must accept that solution if they are under or still under the same misconception.
The public will agree with the cyber and satellite warfare program regarding the commitment we have and have written in this book to tell the truth in writing, to be checked for error and conspiracy. We have told the full truth and are not playing with the lives of others in an effort to be defiant. We do not use power and authority like a toy or a novelty. We do not act or have a senseless life which inflicts senseless abuse on others. Maybe the left will have a heart attack because of how stressed they are and come clean by walking into the office of the prosecutors and assisting with this matter before they perish off the earth. At least this will ease the comforts of those affected by their abuse of power and suicide thereafter. That is all part of hostage rescue that you must get used to, the goal is to take others with them. The world is safer but the ones who started the situation were never brought to justice. They will regenerate and have a fine life trying to pester or rip off others. It is not about cooperating with the real authorities or doing the right thing, it is about blocking it and striving for more power until it is the ultimate toy of the left. To say they do not have government backing is not realistic.
We will continue to cooperate with the public as long and as much as needed to prosecute the individuals behind this matter. We hope the people who are behind this matter cooperate fully with the prosecutors as we have instead of constantly arresting us on trumped up charges that have zero merit or authority. Their efforts are completely powerless but they continue the theatrics and the hostage situation with hostage rescuers. We have forfeited the information over to the prosecutors for the hundredth time; we are almost accustomed to bad service and conspiracy. We will try to submit the information to real prosecutors an additional time since we are so accustomed to this now.
Instead the theatrics are constantly changing while the self prosecution is impossible. They always give you what you do not want while telling you they are your masters and in control. The left sees them as preordained to be, become, or am the masters of the human race. They have done the same thing over and over and will continue to do the same cat and mouse game with prosecutors. It is not the choice of prosecutors to demand what they want or the cooperation they need, the political left will make this clear. This is also why the prosecutors are under the microscope because we know the left never gives you what you want and never give the cooperation sought.
Day in and day out the problem of the left is identical. Day in and day out the stress of the left is identical and overlapping. It is not a hearing problem or a learning problem; it is a lack of education. Keep in mind; it took more than a lifetime to get an order of protection from the left. Even when this order of protection was never granted, the political left were still making excuses and trying to make contact with the cyber and satellite warfare program. How do you prosecute the problem with access and proximity when the people who govern access and proximity have already achieved this and refuse to leave. The problem is the nonexistence of this order of protection, then it is the process of seeking it, then it is the process of enforcing it and prosecuting it. This is the bunker mentality of the left because it is the same people who are saying, “We care and we want to help.” How can you care and want to help when the problem is with this order of protection? How can you care and want to help when hundreds of requests for this order of protection is blocked and responded with attacks and nonstop pestering? Is the situation that difficult to understand?
Are the problems of the cyber and satellite warfare program that difficult to explain? On top of this we have the scientific education and the knowledge to engineer the program itself. It is too much to ask and most annoying to waste time away when you are an engineer and your task is scientific principle. Why are you wasting all your time in jail or pleading to prosecute simple things such as home invasions, vandalism and other matters? Why are you not spending time on the big problems and the strategic matters? Are you being attacked and held hostage or something? Do you need an order of protection, what is the problem and why has ten years been pissed away? The people who are behind it do not even have any scientific knowledge or education yet they insist they are the authority and power. That is how ridiculous and how much rage is filled by the situation. They were ordered to speak to real prosecutors and cease the level of clandestine. Instead, they disobeyed repeatedly and circumvented or hijacked the situation making it a long lasting flavor while everyone sat twinkling their thumbs. They cannot exert authority when they are ordered to speak to the real prosecutors and clear up some things relating to conspiracy and using the instruments of power in an abusive manner which furthered or prolonged this hostage situation. Everyone is sitting patiently for the political left to end this situation.
It was an utter disappointment to see who showed up for a fight and to know they are worse than the devil himself. You are not allowed to go out in public or even go on vacation while they are on duty and in protection mode. You cannot work and you cannot do anything while they have you as a hostage and put you under surveillance. We were forced to check each state and finally conclude we had to move offshore, that is how powerful the political left is and how annoying this matter truly is. Had the order of protection been granted back when it was requested, in 1999, then this entire matter could have been avoided. Our hostage taking would have been preventable. Had this order of protection been cooperative, we could have brought each and every one of the left to justice. Instead, nothing ever happened, nothing needs to be fixed, nobody is accountable, and we are the lucky recipients of the bill and the damages. Does it get anymore ridiculous or will the political left leave in search of jobs rather than hold national security hostage while begging for their end and begging for the pity of the public? The left were given a chance to help a decade ago and they blew it. Instead, they managed to become number one on the list. In cyber and satellite warfare there are no second chances and there is no such thing as a second chance, we try to encourage others to be careful and to be mindful that power and authority is not a toy and a novelty of exuberance. You can be the most difficult and the neediest person in the world; it will not change the rules or make any difference. How you argue shooting up our school while we are in our strongest hour is outrageous. We are not sure if they are done but we know they might be done trying. This is why “Shay has the gauge and Vanilla has the nine,” bunker mentality. The immediate threat is not environmental policy or health care. The immediate threat is the structure which h empowers and allows criticism while ignoring the true problems. The United Nations needs to solve the immediate threat rather than invoke or incite more problems for revolt. We judge them by their errors, not their effort.
If there is any military leader on this earth who states he or she is able to defeat the forces of the left on the battlefield, then they are viewed with grave suspicion. At most, you can defend territory; however, to say the left can be defeated on the battlefield is an adventurous mind. There is no weapon which allows this. We do not know if
On the battlefield, it is either victory or loss, there is no such thing as a negotiated peace or a middle gap between victory and defeat. The reason why we do not interfere with military leadership is the availability of options and the goal of becoming the best soldiers in the world. Your heart and mind may want to become the best, so your heart and mind must allow others the ability to achieve this. One rule of thumb that is very important is, you never wage war against your brothers in arms unless they decide to wage war on you in an immoral manner. The political system has been turned into a system of revolt and we only are concerned at this time with the spread of this mentality into other areas of the government. We are confident it will never have a breath in the global military systems of the world. The only way the political left will ever achieve this is to break the golden rule and wage war on their brothers in arms in an immoral manner. There is not one single General out there who will disagree with this disposition of the political left and the global leftist movement. To solve the problem of the left, you must have National Security, it is that easy. Until you can achieve National Security, access and proximity will never be achieved. It is that simple to understand and explain.
If you want to get into the fight, then you must understand the problem. You cannot simply sit back and give orders when you do not know what the orders are about and expect others to follow blindly. We do not know the extent of the problem because those who do this never explain themselves, maybe it is because they cannot and will not, we do not know. What we know is only what we have and even under attack by the left, we have tried to make it known under tremendous pressure and odds. Need the problem spread like a disease of the mind or a failure of the spirit? However, we are accustomed to the bad service now and expect the levels of bad service we have witnessed while being a hostage. That is the worst situation of all, when people not only know it but expect it because they simply cannot do anything right while the matter gets messed up more. If they want to defend the nation, then they need to understand the problem and the solution. If they want to rip it off, then that’s up for the public to judge. We have a hand off policy and were going to just move it offshore, it is that simple. Our goal is to set up the program and write the manuals, not be engaged with an enemy of the state or be dragged through prison and legal proceedings indefinitely. This was not how things are supposed to be but they turned out this way by no fault of our own. It is clearly documented in written material dating back ten years to this present. This was only when it was detected while it was getting worse. We have done everything possible; we leave the rest to the real prosecutors to do their part.
Be very mindful to the reality, we have never said we do not support the right. We wrote the book for the right and for them to clean up their act when it comes to the left. If they cannot do this, then they have no business calling themselves the right. However, the left has no reason or business to even claim to be the right. This book was never intended to be for or intended to be in the possession of the left, however, they will probably try to steal the meaning behind it, clandestinely or not. This book has also made it very clear that differences are to be respected and not violated. It is in no way catered or aimed towards the left; it is intended to become the manual for the right in dealing with global problems. How the left became entangled in this book is left to the real prosecutors who are sought to prosecute the matter. However, somewhere, perhaps a decade ago, this got really messed up. It was the left who came to the cyber and satellite warfare program and attacked it. We only documented what happened and their efforts, and then this was turned over to the real prosecutors. There is a criminal basis and a civil basis in this book which needs to be separated. All civil matters are handled by lawyers; we are soldiers and hostage rescuers, not lawyers. The prosecutors are waiting patiently for the explanations and transparency. We sought a protective order a decade ago to ensure there would be no contact, no clandestine communications, no hostage situation, and most of all no abuse or mistreatment. Our requests turned into a witch hunt and a reckless abuse of power where rashes to judgment were as frequent as the attacks. We are not sure what to make of it because we were not very engaged or interested during it. That protection order turned out to become a hostage crisis. Now we are trying to seek both the legal and criminal basis of that refusal for a protection order which became the basis of the demise of the cyber and satellite warfare program. How wrong could it possibly get?
Saturday, December 15, 2007
Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor now running for the Republican presidential nomination, lays out a policy plan that is long on optimism but short on details in the January-February issue of the journal Foreign Affairs, which is published by the Council on Foreign Relations. A copy of his article was released Friday.
"American foreign policy needs to change its tone and attitude, open up, and reach out," Huckabee said. "The Bush administration's arrogant bunker mentality has been counterproductive at home and abroad. My administration will recognize that the
In one specific criticism, Huckabee said Bush did not send enough troops to invade
He said this year's troop increase under Bush has resulted in significant but tenuous gains, and he said — much as Bush has — that he would not withdraw troops from Iraq any faster than Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander there, recommends. The military has now slowly begun to reverse the troop increase.
Huckabee has previously joked about his lack of experience in international affairs. "I may not be the expert as some people on foreign policy, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night," he said earlier this month.
While the Foreign Affairs article is missing the one-liners he is known for, it does have a few folksy comparisons to illustrate his points. On
He adds that the
Last week, Huckabee missed a report the White House released saying Iran had halted its nuclear weapons program; one day later, the candidate said he was unaware of the report and had been campaigning too hard to read the newspaper or be briefed. The Foreign Affairs article seems to have been written before the report was released, citing "urgent concerns about
In his article, Huckabee also thumped Bush for failing to pursue al-Qaida in
Earlier Friday, on another topic in
"Instead of basing our national budget off of payroll taxes for Social Security ... it means the base of funding is much broader," said Huckabee, whose shoestring campaign has surged nationally and in Iowa, which holds caucuses five days before New Hampshire's Jan. 8 primary.
The tax plan Huckabee has proposed, called the "FAIR tax," would eliminate federal income and investment taxes and replace them with a 23 percent federal sales tax. Even the backers of the tax admit it is unlikely to get through Congress, and other leading GOP candidates have been critical of the idea.
It's a tough sell in
"Low-income or retired would pay the same tax as somebody who has a million dollars," said Sweezey, an independent. "I guess if you don't buy anything, you don't pay any sales tax, but if you do buy something, you pay sales tax."
Separately, Huckabee also named Republican political strategist Ed Rollins as his national campaign chairman. Rollins was national campaign director for Ronald Reagan in the 1984 presidential election.
Foxnews.com[1]
__________
Caller: Do Something, You Libs![2]
December 17, 2007
Listen To It! WMP | RealPlayer
Audio clips available for Rush 24/7 members only -- Join Now!
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: We'll start in
CALLER: Happy holidays, Rush.
RUSH: Same to you.
CALLER: You know, at the beginning of the hour you were talking about the news media whining about, you know, the persons who were hurt the most are women and minorities --
RUSH: Right. Exactly.
CALLER: -- and whatever.
RUSH: And the poor, yeah, the poor.
CALLER: Oh, the, of course, poor. Of course. Over here, if you're a minority or you're poor, we're not going to help you. We're just going to whine about it -- and the media, that's all they talk about is: "We're hurting everybody." Well, the truth is, why don't they get off their ass and go and do something?
RUSH: I love that attitude... Because the left in this country has done such a great job of making victims out of every minority and even some majorities like women. In numerical terms, women are a majority, and yet they're victims.
CALLER: You know what, everybody that I know that has a job, any kind of a job, they're doing okay. So who's getting hurt? I don't see anybody getting hurt that has a job.
RUSH: No, but they get caught up in the media narrative of all this stuff, and they read the stories or see them on television, and even though they know that they're doing okay, they're made to worry that their neighbors aren't doing well -- and then they feel guilty and then they believe that things are in turmoil over the state of the economy, even though their own personal experience is as you cite.
CALLER: Just take one homeless person and help 'em. Just go out and help 'em.
RUSH: No!
CALLER: But nobody's going to do that. They'll run you over in a crosswalk, though.
RUSH: Oh, no! You can't help 'em. They're supposed to stay homeless because they are props for the Democrats in the presidential campaign.
CALLER: Yeah, you need the butts in the seats.
RUSH: That's right. (laughing) I like this attitude, though. "Why not just get up and do something?" and, by the way, Barbara, I can tell you what the reaction of some of the audience is, because we've got a lot of libs and "progressives" in this audience, and they hear you say that, just like when I used to say, "Well, why don't we teach them to work, get them a job?"
"Oh! Easy for you to say!" as though that's cruel, as though that's inhumane.
We should acknowledge their circumstance and understand that there's a reason for it, and that is the
END TRANSCRIPT
__________
ALBANY, N.Y. - Gov. Eliot Spitzer is refusing to comment on a report that his administration is being hit with another subpoena in the case of two staffers accused of plotting to discredit Senate Republican leader Joseph Bruno.
"I have absolutely nothing to say," Spitzer told reporters in
"I really have no continuing interest in it and just kind of don't think about it, don't worry about it," Spitzer says.
newsday.com[3]
This next news wire was a surprise party in itself; however, the best movie about interplanetary attacks is the movie “They Live” with Roddy Roddy Piper. The first interesting aspect about the movie is naturally the plot and the characters. The next interesting aspect about the movie is how the main character is Scottish and it is being viewed through the eyes of rugged individualism. Rugged individualism is a very self reliant sect of Protestantism and is derived from Calvinism. The movie “They Live” was an offshoot of the movie “Night of the Living Dead” which preceded it. In that movie the monsters were zombies, not mechanical professionals or social elites of flesh and bones who controlled society. Independence Day is similar because it is science fiction and told through the eyes of the “Men in Black”; not black men as this next news wire suggests.
We Prefer Mars Attacks, Hillary
December 17, 2007
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: This is yesterday in
HILLARY: There's so much we can do if we work together as a world. Now, remember that movie Independence Day where invaders were come from outer space and the whole world was united against the invasion? Well, why can't we be united on behalf of our planet? And that's what I want to do, to get more and more people to understand that and be involved to protect our environment.
RUSH: Well, let's talk about movies. You know, I remember the movie Mars Attacks. Remember the little green guys showed up from Mars wearing little glass helmets and so forth and they started zipping and laughing everybody and they had this funny little language -- Ack! Ack! Ack! Ack! -- when they talked to each other. Jack Nicholson is the president. The first lady is Glenn Close. Nicholson adopts a Hillary. These guys walk in and they gun down everybody in the Senate with their little Martian weapons, and finally they head over to the White House to take care of Nicholson and Nicholson gives a little speech. Folks, if she can cite a movie, that we all need to work together in the world to save the planet; I can cite one too. So here comes a little Martian leader with his little glass helmet there with the big bug eyes and veins all over his face, and these Martians don't walk. They just sort of glide in the room, and Nicholson rolls up his sleeves, "Come on, you people. What is it with you little people? We could do so much working together. Look at what we both bring to the table! I don't know what your problems are, but let's sit down and talk about them. This carnage must stop," and of course the little Martian leader has his two minions, one on each side, and he looks around at each of them and sort of goes, "Ack! Ack!" and smiles and offers his hand. The little Martian leader offers his hand to Nicholson, Nicholson takes the little Martian leader's hand and shakes it and then the Martian leaders pops Nicholson with his weapon, kills him, and the little Martian flag pops out of the chest cavity of the dead president of the United States. So if I'd have been in the audience I'd have said, "Mrs. Clinton, remember the movie Mars Attacks? Remember if you just blame your own country for the problems that the world is having, and think all you gotta do is get together and think all the people like the Martian leader in Mars Attacks, you're going to end up and the rest of us..." Citing a movie, Independence Day! Remember, now, the reputation: this is the smartest woman in the world citing movies as foreign policy examples.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: By the way, I should have told you: on these two sound bites that we had with Mrs. Clinton on the Today show today, you need to see the looks on her faces. NewsBusters.org has it. During the cackle when David Gregory is telling her she's not answering the question, the look on her face is, "I'm going to get you for this." It is priceless. By the way, Mrs. Clinton was talking about a movie. For those of you in
END TRANSCRIPT
When it comes to a bunker mentality or arrogance, the cyber and satellite warfare program should be facing measurements beyond the scope of measurements due to the total number of times we were attacked and the number of times we were imprisoned on the local and federal level. Over the span of a decade at an average of three attacks a day, not including the refusal to go into public and being a prisoner in our home; the total number of attacks registers over 3,000. The President of the
If you seek the approval and dependence for approval by the authority of the left, then the bunker mentality becomes a measure of how ridiculous and misguided authority can be. There is a basic misconception between authority and real authority. There is a misconception between a personal truth and the full truth. You would also have to measure this bunker mentality on the level of clandestine effort. We have never made any clandestine effort because we never had any desire to run for office, we never had to. It was just a matter of trying to walk in the other direction if possible while someone you do not know or have never met is trying to pursue you or hold you hostage as a prisoner in your own home. It was just a matter of waiting for them to expend all of their ammunitions and tricks or begin the effort to move National Security offshore where conditions may be better and more compatible. Doing the right thing is not a bunker mentality, understanding what you are doing may be.
In the spiritual realm, religious doctrine does demand from the human disciple the effort to do the right thing. There is a big gap between the effort and the result. The problem, however, is whether or not that human being is able to understand the effort. It is like the problem with terrorists, terrorists make zero effort to understand the world they live in, they only understand what they perceive to be their own reality, and then apply to this reality their religious doctrine. Had they made the effort to understand the world they live in or the reality of the world, then the selfish views would not fall to deaf ears. Terrorists make zero effort to understand their hostage or understand the situation, they act frivolously and this creates a lot of danger. Terrorism is not a question of authority, authority is not defined. In textbooks, authority is simply the ability to exert a will on another subject. Even criminals have authority and even the poorest of the poor have authority. Even if the secret formula behind authority remains a mystery, people recognize it when they see it. Therefore, authority is a poor measure of reality and not concentrated in reality alone.
So a bunker mentality only exists when people fail to do the right thing and this can come from either a lack of effort or a lack of understanding to apply the effort. Religion or religious doctrine is not going to cure the problem with dogma in this world which is based on ideology and a lack of scientific thought. However, the relationship between dogma and religion has not been explored. We know extremism and religion is an explosive realationship. It is doubtful if religious or parochial teachings will cure genetic deficiencies. This means that if a person born unjust, introducing religion will make that same person religious and more unjust. Compassionate religions do have very promising aspects towards education and produces some of the best teachers who study religious texts, then mindfully apply it to the sciences. Religion does not cure dogma which we see from the political left and neither does the sciences.
Romney Looked Great on Meet the Press
December 17, 2007
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Here's Andy in
CALLER: Hi, Rush.
RUSH: Hey.
CALLER: I have a question and maybe a comment. It seems to me that you're absent any kind of evaluation as to the performance of Mitt Romney yesterday on Meet the Press. I'm just curious as to why that seems to be the case?
RUSH: In fact I've got some Romney sound bites coming up in the second half hour of the program.
CALLER: Okay. Well, you know, I guess my thoughts on that is and I know I'm going to be kind of bold, unlike what he seems to be.
RUSH: (laughs)
CALLER: I don't see much of in you depth to him. He seems to be very just political, and it was interesting that you were talking about appearances and so forth, because on the surface this guy looks great -- and, you know, I haven't been following these people that are in the Republican Party very long, but last week, Mitt made a pretty neat little speech there with George H. W. Bush --
RUSH: That was a great. By the way, that was a fabulous speech for what it was.
CALLER: I agree with you, and unfortunately, he didn't seem to carry that same kind of a fortitude in his gut over to yesterday's performance, and I guess one of the things that really bothered me most so that when he was asked by Tim Russert if he would use, you know, the liberal terminology and try to catch people, a litmus -- quote, unquote, "litmus" -- test, of course not. It was just so political. It was so superficial to me. Nothing that I could really sink my teeth into. It bothered me. As an atheist, even being thought to have a position on the Supreme Court? Ludicrous!
RUSH: Wait, wait, wait, wait. Did he say an atheist could serve on the Supreme Court?
CALLER: He said that. "Would there be a litmus test?" in other words, if somebody --
RUSH: Well, that's not... You know, you don't better than... The litmus test question is, "Are you going to make sure somebody wants to overturn Roe vs. Wade?" It's all about abortion. That's an abortion question. The atheist question came up, he was asked was: "Do you think atheists could be moral?" He said yeah.
CALLER: Well, yeah. Yeah, I think that the litmus test is always used -- you're correct -- but this is in the context of who would be suited to be on the Supreme Court, and I thought that it was very weak of him not to just come out and say," No, I believe that the Founding Fathers had a position, and that position was based on morality and godliness, and I don't see any reason why we shouldn't use this, quote, unquote, 'litmus test' to see who is suited to be on a court that has so much power." I don't think that's farfetched, at all.
RUSH: Okay, I agree with you about one thing. I wish you would have carried over to the themes that he addressed in that speech. He had the opportunity because Russert spent, what, 20 minutes of a whole hour yesterday talking about Mormonism and religion? He had the opening today it. He had to know Russert was going to do that. You can't blame Russert. If you agree to go on the show, the show is what it is so you gotta be able to handle what they ask.
CALLER: Oh, absolutely. I'm not blame Russert at all.
RUSH: You can't say, "Well, the Democrats don't get asked these questions," because you know there's a different standard.
CALLER: Of course, I understand that. Of course what it is is there's the leadership quality that you didn't see him fill. I've been beholding judgment and just trying to --
RUSH: I want to ask you a question, and I'm not being frivolous with this or any other "-ous" with this. But I want to know something from you. How did you think he looked? Physically.
CALLER: (laughs) Right.
RUSH: Forget what he said, forget the words. How did he look?
CALLER: Well, this is interesting. I was listening while I was waiting online, and you were talking about appearances, and I'm telling you, the guy looks great. He looks presidential. He had the appearance. I mean, if you were to have a people picture of somebody that would be put into a presidential mode, he's the man. But see, that means very little to me, and I don't think it means a whole lot to the majority of the American people. I really believe that. But that's not to say that there aren't also quite a few people in the American group that do care about nothing more than appearances. But, no, he looked great. But what does that mean? I mean I'm interested in what the guy thinks.
RUSH: I understand what you're saying. I'm telling you it means more than you know. This is not... Don't misunderstand anything, folks. I don't endorse people in the primaries unless there's just two people and one of them is clearly above the other, and that's not the case here yet. It's tough. I've met Mitt Romney one time, and it was about 45 minutes, and he was genuine and nice. There was not one moment in that 45 minutes I thought I was talking with an actor who was trying to spin me or show me something about himself that wasn't really true, but that's true of Bush, too. Bush is so different in person than he is when you see him on television. It's striking, the difference.
CALLER: I have no reason to doubt you, that's for sure. I never met him. I guess to me it just --
RUSH: You sound just like Romney, by the way. You sound very much like Romney. Your inflection, your intonation, sound a lot like Romney.
CALLER: Hmm.
RUSH: You sound very genuine to me.
CALLER: Well, you know, I would hope to think that I am. I would think that you are as well and that's why I listen to you for so long.
RUSH: Are you tending to want to vote Republican in the presidential race?
CALLER: I gotta tell you, I have to confess, I don't vote, normally, because I live in
RUSH: Well, I was going to bring that up but I decided not to because, you know, I didn't want you to think I was saying, "Hey, Mitt can be that if Hillary is." I didn't want you to think I was saying that.
CALLER: (laughs) I know.
RUSH: But you're right, there's no authenticity on that side of the aisle either.
CALLER: No kidding. I just don't know. It just struck me. Something so basic as to who we would choose to be on the Supreme Court, and yet he seemed to vacillate in that, and then he used the word "fees" rather than taxes, which is what they are. Tim and he had a little battle back and forth back and forth, it was on and on and on. So he was painful, to be perfectly honest with you.
RUSH: Well, we'll play some of these sound bites in the next half hour and you'll have -- the audience will have -- a chance to hear what you heard.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: All right, let's go to the audio sound bites. We have a couple of them here. Mitt Romney was on Meet the Press with Tim Russert yesterday, and here's Russert's question. "Here was the headlines in the papers in June of '78. 'Mormon Church Dissolves Black Bias. Citing new revelation from God, the president of the Mormon Church decreed for the first time black males could fully participate in church rites.' You were 31 years old, and your church was excluding blacks from full participation. Didn't you think, 'What am I doing part of an organization that is viewed by many as a racist organization?'"
ROMNEY: I'm very proud of my faith, and it's the faith of my fathers, and I certainly believe that it is a, a faith -- well, it's true and I love my faith. And I'm not going to distance myself in any way from my faith. But you can see what I believed and what my family believed by looking at, at our lives. My dad marched with Martin Luther King. My mom was a tireless crusader for civil rights. (snip) I was anxious to see a change in my church. I can remember when, when I heard about the change being made. I was driving home from, I think, it was law school, but I was driving home, going through the Fresh Pond rotary in
RUSH: He just teared up there on Meet the Press. I wonder... I forgot to ask the guy from Lemoore,
ROMNEY: That's an insult to the president, and Mike Huckabee should apologize to the president.
RUSSERT: This is what Mitt Romney said about Iraq, however, in September this year. "OK, well, first of all, it is a mess."
ROMNEY: Well, it is a mess. There's no question, if you, if you...
RUSSERT: That's no reflection on George Bush?
ROMNEY: If you're suggesting that it's equivalent to say that we made a number of errors and that we have a very difficult situation in
RUSH: Now, these are the two that we have. Cookie, don't bother to go get 'em, it's not... Well, maybe for tomorrow, the atheist and the Supreme Court questions, since that's what the guy from
You have to formulate the picture. You have to listen to the words which help formulate the picture. It's what we call in this business "active participation," "active listening" rather than passive. You know, there is passive listening to radio, and that's when you listen to elevator music stations. You can have it on in the background. You don't really care what's going on. But a program like this, which is compelling, is called active. Television can be passive. You can have television on and be doing gobs of other things. You can have your television on, have your attention be distracted, and you really don't mind. Radio is a little bit different thing because you're totally engaged. So when you listen to Romney here, and you don't see him, you don't have any idea what he looks like, does he come across as calculating and an actor and contrived? It doesn't to me. But if you see it, you might come up with an entirely different perception, which is also I was saying at the top of this first hour about how important visual perceptions are with our Hollywood-born and bred addiction to perfection. Now, Huckabee responded to Romney on Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer yesterday. Blitzer said, "Okay, Romney wants you to apologize to the president. What do you say?"
HUCKABEE: I'm the one who actually supported the president's surge. I supported the Bush tax cuts when Mr. Romney didn't. I was with President Bush on gun control and Mitt Romney wasn't. I was with the president on the president's pro-life position when Mitt Romney wasn't. I was with the president on his position on same sex relationships and marriage when Mitt Romney wasn't. I was with the president on the legacy of the president's dad and Ronald Reagan, when Mitt Romney wasn't. So, you know, I don't have anything to apologize for.
RUSH: Okay. Not a bad answer, folks, not a bad answer. He didn't answer the question, but it's not a bad answer. He didn't talk about Bush and the bunker mentality and so forth. He was very critical of Bush foreign policy. "No, I was with the president on the surge." I don't know if he's accurate on all these claims about where Romney was and wasn't, any of that, but still a good answer -- and you don't apologize. I don't care what. With something like this, you don't apologize. That's when you look like you are weak. It's one of the cardinal rules for young media stars of the future: you don't apologize until you have established a deep and loyal connection with your audience, and when it's genuinely required, but you don't do it to gain points. You don't do it to score points. You don't do it for any reason other than being genuine.
END TRANSCRIPT
__________
The Huckster Sounds Like Perot
December 17, 2007
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: We go back to Eureka, South Dakota, this is Charlie. I'm glad you waited, sir. Welcome to the EIB Network.
CALLER: Rush, thank you very much.
RUSH: You bet, sir.
CALLER: I am totally honored and humbled by being able to wish you, sir -- the supreme conservative commander of the world -- mega dittos and merry Christmas.
RUSH: Thank you very much, and the same to you, sir.
CALLER: I have a number of things about Mike Huckabee that I really, really love and I'd like to push one really neat idea. When my kids were in school, I told my children that if your science teacher wants to talk about evolution, you raise your hand, you stand up, and you say, "Sir, if you want to think that you came from apes, my father has instructed me to let you think that, but the Hoffmans do not, sir," and Mike Huckabee's conservative response to the creationism on national television to millions and millions of people, just put fear into the hearts of all the liberals who want to think that there is somebody else out there besides God running our lives.
RUSH: All right, I'm very curious. I'm glad you called, Charlie, because you're an avowed, committed Huckster, and I want to ask you, what is it primarily about Mr. Huckabee, Governor Huckabee that excites you? Is it that he's a Baptist minister, former Baptist minister and is saying things that resonate with you on matters of like you just said creation and God, is that the primary reason he's an attractive to you?
CALLER: Really what I'm attracted to, Rush, is he is kind. He is thoughtful. He is the quickest man on his feet with the correct answers that I think have a moral basis, better than all the other candidates.
RUSH: What all do you know about his policies and the things that he did as governor, the things that he said policy-wise during his presidential campaign?
CALLER: I do not know a lot about what happened in
RUSH: Well, okay. I actually think he's a populist like
CALLER: Okay.
RUSH: This is the only two paragraphs. "The
CALLER: I would have to say that I would agree with the latter part, being that I don't think it's in our best interests to follow what the UN is doing. I think we should be autonomous from that.
RUSH: Well, that's the Law of the Sea Treaty, but he didn't just attack the UN. He aimed at the Bush administration, and he said it's an "arrogant bunker mentality that's been counterproductive at home and abroad." He also said that
CALLER: I agree a hundred percent, and I would say, too, though, to that, the decrease in deaths in
RUSH: So Huckabee writes this piece basically savaging the Bush administration's "arrogant bunker mentality." Now, one thing I know, I remember back in the '92 campaign, Ross Perot came along, and I had my instincts. I had misgivings about it from the get-go, and I shared those misgivings, and I tried to talk the Perot people out of it. "You people are being fooled. He's not even serious about wanting to be elected. There's something else going on here. I'm going to get to the bottom of it and find out." I found out what it was. When it looked like he was going to win, he pulled out, then he got back in. He basically gave the election to the Democrats and Bill Clinton. But what I remember is that all during that period -- when I was so intense and so purposefully desirous of trying to get the Perot people to see the light -- they didn't want to see it. They were like cultists, and I learned that you cannot talk cultists out of their cult. You just have to let 'em see it for themselves in the time it takes for it all to unfold, and I think with Huckabee, I don't think his people are cultists, don't misunderstand.
CALLER: Right.
RUSH: But I think there are two or three things about him that have drawn people to him, that are going to make them overlook some other things that ought to raise some red flags.
CALLER: Okay. I would have to agree and state that he might be trying to work his way towards the middle, which, in America today, I think if you're going to try to get 54, 55% of the vote and become president, you need to be closer to the middle than the outside.
RUSH: Well, now, what is the outside? Is mainstream conservatism the outside?
CALLER: Uhhh.
RUSH: See, Ronald Reagan didn't move to "the middle." Ronald Reagan got two landslides on straight, down the middle conservatism. It wins nationally every time it's tried.
CALLER: Right. Right. I would say the conservatives today in
RUSH: No.
CALLER: -- expecting them to do it.
RUSH: Conservatives have the compassion to tell people less fortunate than us how to change their circumstances, how to educate them, how to teach them. Because we believe, as conservatives in the full potential of every human being, based on how much that human being wants it, and that's what we try to do. We count compassion by how many people don't need federal assistance anymore.
CALLER: I agree.
RUSH: That's our definition of compassion.
CALLER: I agree. We get up everyday. We have one thing that we need to work on. That's our own attitude. We can either make to or break it --
RUSH: Right.
CALLER: -- in the first five minutes of the morning.
RUSH: My only point to you is that -- and I'm not going to repeat what I did with Perot, because it's not going to work. The only thing I'll say to you is, "I think if you dug deep, you would find..." Well, you admitted it. You think Huckabee is "moving to the middle," because he's moving to the middle, he's abandoning what? The right. He'll stick solid on certain things on the right because he knows that he is attracting a portion of the population based on religious and moral and ethical values, which is fine, but on some of these other areas that also define conservatism like taxes and so forth, he doesn't have the pedigree. But I'm not going to try to talk you out of it. No, I don't even think about it. I'm not trying to talk you out of it. I'm not attacking you because I know you can't, because you called here and you think he's the one true conservative out there because of the things that matter a lot to you, he's right on the money on them. So we'll see what unfolds in the few short weeks ahead to when we finally get nominees for both parties. In the meantime, Charlie, thanks for the calm. It's great to talk to you. Thanks for enduring my, quote, unquote, "challenge." You're a gutsy guy.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Pete Wehner, who used to work in the White House (he was on Karl Rove's staff, number one behind Rove) has a piece today on Huckabee. It's at National Review Online, and he also wants to take issue with the first two paragraphs of Huckabee's essay that he wrote in Foreign Affairs magazine, particularly the claim by Huckabee that we're too mean around the world; we're trying to dominate the world, and we need to be more like a top high school student, modest about our abilities and achievements, generous, and that we will be loved. If we keep dominating people, we'll be despised, and "the Bush administration's arrogant and bunker mentality has been counterproductive at home and abroad." Now, understandably, Mr. Wehner, is a former member of the president's staff working with Karl Rove. So keep that in mind as I share with you just some brief comments from his essay today.
"The fact is that the
"Beyond that, the belief that if we are modest and generous we will be 'loved' by other nations, and that anger at
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: I got something for you to think about here before we go to the break. If you really want the world to love us, really want the world to love us, stop foreign aid. Just cut 'em off! You'll see every country on this planet look at us with love, affection, open arms. They'll come begging on bended knee.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: I'm serious, and I remember proposing this way back in the early nineties: a drastic change to foreign aid. We have two lists. We have the list of supportive, good countries, and we have the excrement list -- and if you're a country, you don't want to be on the excrement list. How do you get on the excrement list? Very simple. All you do is trash us. You run around, and you criticize our country, you criticize our president while you're taking billions in aid from us, you get on the excrement list, and you get cut off -- and you don't get off the excrement list until you've done two years of praising this country and thanking it and so forth. I guarantee you, it will never happen, but it would make us the most loved nation on the face of the earth -- until about a year after they get off the excrement list, then if they start trashing us again, then we'd have to put 'em back on the excrement list, and we'd have to have the guts to keep doing that.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: This is No-dra in
CALLER: Nodra.
RUSH: Nah-dra. I got it right the second time. Welcome to the program.
CALLER: Thank you, and Merry Christmas.
RUSH: Same to you.
CALLER: Huckabee, there is a [George C. Scott] movie that was made quite a few years ago. It was called the "
RUSH: (laughter) Yes. Yes. Yes.
CALLER: That's Huckabee.
RUSH: I thought you were talking about Elmer Gantry for a second.
CALLER: (laughing) Well, probably that, too, but anyway, it's a movie. He's a water diviner and he keeps double-talking everything and everybody looking for his water, and that reminds me of Huckabee.
RUSH: What do you have against Huckabee?
CALLER: What?
RUSH: What do you have against Huckabee?
CALLER: What do I have against Huckabee? He says one thing one time to an audience and another thing to another audience.
RUSH: Like?
CALLER: In
RUSH: Even though he's done it as governor?
CALLER: Even though he's a he's done it as governor. So that --
RUSH: Well, who is your candidate out there, Nodra.
CALLER: Me. No, I don't have one. (laughing)
RUSH: (laughs) We all think we could be doing better jobs than these guys are!
CALLER: (laughter) Probably, right now. But the other thing Huckabee is a minister in a church. Would we elect a Catholic priest?
RUSH: Well, he's "former."
CALLER: You're never a "former." I mean, once you're a minister, you always have that Word behind you and that feeling behind you, and would you elect a rabbi as a president?
RUSH: Would you elect a first lady?
CALLER: If it was the right one.
RUSH: Yeah, okay. (laughs)
CALLER: (laughing)
RUSH: I thought I'd trip you up; you're too fast for me.
CALLER: Well...
RUSH: By the way, what's the weather like out in
CALLER: Sixty.
RUSH: Sixties. Is that normal for this time of year?
CALLER: Yes. Probably December and the first part of January are our coldest months. Now we start warming up to 70 and 80.
RUSH: Well, cool. I hope you have a Merry Christmas as you said at the beginning, Nodra. Thanks so much, I have to run because of the constraints time and the very complicated programming format.
CALLER: Have a good day.
RUSH: You do the same.
END TRANSCRIPT
"Too Bad" lyrics by Nickelback
Mother’s hands were lined with dirt
From long days in the field
And mother’s hands are serving meals
In a cafe on this street
With mouths to feed
Just trying to keep clothing on our backs
And all I hear about is
How it's so bad, it's so bad
(Chorus)
It's too bad, it's too bad
Too late, so wrong, so long
It's too bad that we had no time to rewind
Let's walk, let's talk
Let's talk
You left without saying goodbye
Although I'm sure you tried
You call and ask from time to time
To make sure we're alive
But you weren't there
Right when I'm needing you the most
And now I dream about it
How it's so bad, it's so bad
(Chorus)
Father's hands are lined with guilt
For tearing us apart
Guess it turned out in the end
Just look at where we are
Made it up, still got clothing on our backs
And now I scream about it
How it's so bad, it's so bad
(Chorus)
No time, last one, let's go
"10,000 Fists" lyrics by Disturbed
Survivor
Survivor
One more goddamn day when I know what I want
And my want will be considered tonight, considered tonight
Just another day when all that I want
Will mark me as a sinner tonight, I'm a sinner tonight, yeah
(Chorus)
People can no longer cover their eyes
If this disturbs you then walk away
You will remember the night you were struck by the sight of
Ten Thousand fists in the air
Power un-restrained dead on the mark
Is what we will deliver tonight, deliver tonight
Pleasure fused with pain this triumph of the soul
Will make you shiver tonight, will make you shiver tonight, yeah
(Chorus)
We are the ones that will open your mind
Leave the weak and the haunted behind (4x)
(Chorus)
Ten Thousand fists in the air
Ten Thousand fists in the air
"Don't Go Away" lyrics by Oasis
A Cold and frosty morning there's not a lot to say
About the things caught in my mind
As the day was dawning my plane flew away
With all the things caught in my mind
And I wanna be there when you're...
Coming down
And I wanna be there when you hit the ground
So don't go away say what you say
But say that you'll stay
Forever and a day...in the time of my life
Cos I need more time yes I need more time
Just to make things right
Damn my situation and the games I have to play
With all the things caught in my mind
Damn my education I can't find the words to say
About all the things caught in my mind
Me and you what's going on?
All we seem to know is how to show
The feelings that are wrong
“All My Problems” lyrics by Smile Empty Soul
By now...
I should have been somewhere,
Or gone to school, or fixed my hair.
Back down,
Tell it to someone else,
Who gives a shit and needs your help.
(Chorus)
Cos i found,
What i needed,
And I don't need you to tell me how you feel.
And if I fall,
You are not the one that has to cope and deal.
All my problems are for me.
All my problems are for me.
My god,
Look at his tattoos and those earrings,
He could never get.
A good job,
Go home and beat your kids,
So they don't turn out as badd as me.
(Chorus)
I don't need your eyes to see,
I will be what I will be.
Stop coming around cause you bother me,
Stupid mother effer pull your head out your
What don't you get, was i stuttering,
I don't need to take your shiet get away from me.
Stop coming around cause you bother me,
Stupid mother effer pull your head out your
What don't you get, was i stuttering,
I don't need to take your shiet get away from me.
“Life is Beautiful” lyrics by Sixx AM
(Sometimes it takes a trail of blood before you can even find your way back home...)
You can’t quit until you try
You can’t live until you die
You can’t learn to tell the truth
Until you learn to lie
You can’t breathe until you choke
You gotta laugh when you’re the joke
There’s nothing like a funeral to make you feel alive
(Chorus)
Just open your eyes
Just open your eyes
And see that life is beautiful.
Will you swear on your life,
That no one will cry at my funeral?
I know some things that you don’t
I’ve done things that you won’t
There’s nothing like a trailer park to find your way back home
I was waiting for my hearse
What came next was so much worse
It took a funeral to make me feel alive
(Repeat chorus 4 xs)
“Everybody’s Changing” lyrics by Keane
You say you wander your own land
But when I think about it
I don't see how you can
You're aching, you're breaking
And I can see the pain in your eyes
Says everybody's changing
And I don't know why.
So little time
Try to understand that I'm
Trying to make a move just to stay in the game
I try to stay awake and remember my name
But everybody's changing
And I don't feel the same.
You're gone from here
Soon you will disappear
Fading into beautiful light
'cause everybody's changing
And I don't feel right.
So little time
Try to understand that I'm
Trying to make a move just to stay in the game
I try to stay awake and remember my name
But everybody's changing
And I don't feel the same.
So little time
Try to understand that I'm
Trying to make a move just to stay in the game
I try to stay awake and remember my name
But everybody's changing
And I don't feel the same.
Ooo...
Everybody's changing
And I don't feel the same.
[1] This news wire was posted on the Fox news network; however, it originates as an Associated Press news wire.
[2] The remainders of the news wires were posted on the Rush Limbaugh radio web site.
[3] This news wire is the culmination of several news sources and began with WBEN of New York and was finally posted on the newsday.com web site.
No comments:
Post a Comment